« Previous
Current Problems in Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 5
, Pages 281-337
, May 2007
Preventable Errors in the Operating Room: Retained Foreign Bodies after Surgery—Part I
References
- In: Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS editor. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000;
- . Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:229–235
- . Foreign Bodies Left in the Abdomen. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1940;
- . Patient safety practices in the operating room; correct-site surgery and NoThing left behind. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:1307–1319
- Gibbs VC, McGrath M, Russell T. The prevention of retained foreign bodies after surgery. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons. http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/bulletin/2005/gibbs1005.pdf (accessed September 15, 2006).
- American College of Surgeons: Statement on the Prevention of Retained Foreign Bodies after Surgery. http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/statements/st-51.html (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses: AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Standards, Recommended Practices and Guidelines: Recommended practices for sponge, sharp and instrument counts. AORN 2005.
- Joint Commission International Center for Patient Safety: Reducing the Risk of Unintentionally Retained Foreign Bodies. http://www.jcipatientsafety.org/show.asp?durki=11520 (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Department of Veterans Affairs. Prevention of Retained Surgical Items. VHA Directive 2006-030. http://www1.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=1425 (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Eldridge N, Dunn E. New Directive: Preventing Retained Surgical Items in Surgical Procedures. NCPS TIPS VA National Center for Patient Safety. http://www.va.gov/ncps/TIPS/Docs/TIPS_MayJune06.pdf (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Electronic tagging of surgical sponges to prevent their accidental retention. Surgery. 2005;137:298–301
- . Left behind: the stories are scary; a patient finds that his surgeon left a sponge or maybe a clamp in his body. 2004;Boston Globe, December 5
- www.surgicountmedical.com (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Next Generation Bar Coding and Scanning Technologies. http://www.censis.net/home.html (accessed September 15, 2006).
- eMediaWire. Dallas firm receives RFID medical patent. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/10/prweb298483.htm (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. Arch Surg. 2006;141:659–662
- www.clearcount.com (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Retained foreign bodies following intra-abdominal surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:808–812
- . Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:481–489
- . Retained surgical sponge: diagnosis with CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1047–1050
- . CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:919–923
- . Computed tomography of retained abdominal sponges and towels. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989;14:41–45
- . Intrathoracic gossypiboma: magnetic resonance features. Int J Cardiol. 1999;70:199–200
- . FDG PET CT features of an intraabdominal gossypiboma. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:561–563
- . A new pitfall on abdominal PET/CT: a retained surgical sponge. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:839–841
- . Role of CT-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of a gossypiboma: case report. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:713–715
- . The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg. 1996;224:79–84
- . Retained surgical sponge with migration into the duodenum and persistent duodenal fistula. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S74–S77
- . Intracolonic obstruction induced by a retained surgical sponge after trauma laparotomy. J Trauma. 2003;55:989–991
- . Natural history of the retained surgical sponge. South Med J. 1982;75:657–660
- . The retained sponge following intra-abdominal surgery. Arch Surg. 1990;125:405–407
- . Intraperitoneal gossypibomas: the need to count sponges. World J Surg. 2000;24:521–527
- . Gossypiboma; a surgeon’s legacy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:119–120
- . Gossypiboma as an incidentaloma. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31:176–177
- . Cotton-induced pseudotumor of the femur. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:415–417
- Perirenal textiloma: MR and serial CT appearance. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:57–59
- . Retained surgical sponges, a denied neurosurgical reality? (Cautionary note). Neurosurg Rev. 2001;24:41–43
- . Sonographic appearance of a retained surgical sponge in the neck. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000;28:311–313
- . Foreign body granulomas secondary to retained sponge fragment following mitomycin C trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:178–181
- . Sponge-induced granuloma (gauzoma) as a complication of posterior lumbar surgery. Neurol Med Chir. 2005;45:209–211
- . A foreign body (gossypiboma) in pregnancy: first report of a case. Gynecol Surg. 2006;3:130–131
- . Retained intrathoracic surgical swab: CT appearances. J Thorac Imaging. 2000;15:61–64
- . CT features of a pericardial gossypiboma. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:728–730
- . Retained surgical sponge after subtotal thyroidectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:675–676
- . Executive summary: the medical malpractice closed claims study. Conn Med. 1981;45:91–101
- . Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma). Asian J Surg. 2005;28:109–115
- . Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?. Med Care. 2005;43:9
- . When surgical instruments are left behind—in patients. 2004;Philadelphia Inquirer, February 1
- . Excess length of stay, charges and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization: an administrative data-based analysis. JAMA. 2003;290:1868–1874
- . A national profile of patient safety in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:154–170
- Adverse Health Events in Minnesota Hospitals: First Annual Public Report. http://www.health.state.mn.us/patientsafety/aereport0105.pdf (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . The retained surgical sponge. In: Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM editor. Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. 2001;July. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43;AHRQ publication No 01-E058. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap22.htm (accessed September 15, 2006).
- JCAHO Sentinel Event Policy and Procedures—Updated June 2005. http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/PolicyandProcedures/ (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Retained surgical sponge presenting as a pelvic tumor after 25 years. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82:223–225
- . A 40-year old gossypiboma (foreign body granuloma) mimicking a malignant femoral surface tumor. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:221–224
- Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (2004, July). Patient safety advisory—use of xrays for incorrect needle counts. http://www.ecri.org/include/docs/marketing/june_2004_patient_safety_advisory.pdf (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Forgotten needle—an unusual cause of chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;269:68–69
- . Complications of lost needle after suture of vaginal tear following delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2000;264:159–161
- . Retained surgical needle in the perineum (Report of a case with a novel method of search and rescue). J Reprod Med. 1997;42:303–305
- . An unusual foreign body (suturing needle) in the tonsillar region. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5:148–154
- . A retained intraocular surgical needle two years after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:691
- . Use of x-ray in the presence of an incorrect needle count. AORN J. 2001;74:80–81
- . Identifying lost surgical needles using radiographic techniques. AORN J. 2003;78:73–78
- Ponrartana S, Coakley FD, Yeh B, Breiman R, Qayyum A, Joe B, et al. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity. AJR Am J Roentgenol (in press).
- Smith C. Surgical tools left in five patients: UW surgeons take precautions to ensure it doesn’t happen again. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, December 8, 2001: B1. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/49883_error08.shtml (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Gibbs VC. Case and Commentary. Did we forget something? AHRQ Web M&M: Case Commentary. http://www.webmm.ahrq.gov/case.aspx?caseID=27 (accessed March 27, 2007).
- . $280G award took guts: doc left surgical tool in woman’s abdomen. Boston Herald; 2006;January 13
- . In: Instrument left after surgery; doctor sued. St. Petersburg Times; 2001;p. 3;July 24
- . In: Forgotten surgical tools “uncommon but dangerous.”. New York Times; 2003;p. F5;January 21
- . Woman sues over delay in chemotherapy; sponges accidentally left in after exploratory surgery at center of dispute. Chicago Daily Herald; 2002;April 23
- . In: Surgical sponge left in Kaiser patient, report says. San Diego Union Tribune; 2002;p. B1;February 233
- . Surgical errors alleged at Stanford hospital. The Mercury News; 2002;April 30
- Patient safety alert. Retained instruments: rare error or safety concern? (Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv). 2003;10(Suppl):1–3
- . CT appearance of a retained “fish” in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:S75–S77
- . Detection of retained surgical sponges. Radiology. 1983;149:411–413
- . The retained intrapericardial sponge: value of the lateral chest radiograph. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:595–597
- . Imaging of surgical paraphernalia: what belongs in the patient and what does not. Radiographics. 2000;20:1665–1673
- . Retained surgical sponge. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:709–710
- . Laparoscopic removal of a retained surgical instrument. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:241–243
- . Laparoscopic retrieval of a retained surgical sponge: a case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:135–138
- The New York Patient Occurrence and Tracking System. Retained Surgical Sponges. News and Alert #9. http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/hospital/nyports/annual_report/2000-2001/news_and_alerts.htm (accessed September 15, 2006).
- Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items. OR Manager. 2005;21:18–20
- . Canadian Association of General Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 9. Risk factors for retained foreign bodies after surgery. Can J Surg. 2004;47:57–59
- . Letter to the Editor: Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;17:1724–1725
- . The persistent problem of the retained foreign body. Contemp Surg. 2005;61:398–400
- . In: Hospitals must disclose doctor errors. San Francisco Chronicle; 2000;p. A14;1
- . In: Woman awarded $125,000 for operations gone awry; towel and tubing left inside woman. San Francisco Chronicle; 2001;p. A13;June 28
- AORN Online Journal; November 2000:Clinical Issues. http://www.aorn.org/journal/2000/nov2kci.htm (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Patient safety first: counting instruments and sponges. AORN J. 2003;78:290–294
- . Nurses vs surgeons responsibility for sponge counts. AORN J. 1993;57:1457–1458
- AORN: Practice Resources—COUNTS. Denver, CO: AORN; revised October 1997.
- . Alexander’s Care of the Patient in Surgery. 12th ed.. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 2003;
- Samples C, Dunn E. Reducing the Vulnerability of Retained Surgical Sponges. NCPS TIPS VA National Center for Patient Safety. http://www.va.gov/ncps/TIPS/Docs/TIPS_SeptOct04.doc (accessed September 15, 2006).
- . Human factors engineering design demonstrations can enlighten your RCA team. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:119–121
- Wienholz S. In NoThing Left Behind: Prevention of Retained Foreign Bodies GS80, American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress October 2006, H. David Reines (moderator), American College of Surgeons Audiotape, 59-05 134B. National Audio Video Inc, Denver CO. http://www.nationalaudiovideo.com.
- . How ORs decide when to count instruments. OR Manager. 2000;16:1;10, 12-14
- . Nurses, surgeon not negligent in retained instrument suit (Kissinger v Turner). OR Manager. 1995;11:26, 30
- Coakley FD. In NoThing Left Behind: Prevention of Retained Foreign Bodies GS80, American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress October 2006, H. David Reines (moderator), American College of Surgeons Audiotape, 59-05 134A. National Audio Video Inc, Denver CO. http://www.nationalaudiovideo.com.
- . Editor’s note: retained foreign bodies—why do we still allow them to occur?. Surgery. 2005;137:304–305
- Zimmerman M. In NoThing Left Behind: Prevention of Retained Foreign Bodies GS80, American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress October 2006, H. David Reines (moderator), American College of Surgeons Audiotape, 59-05 134A. National Audio Video Inc, Denver CO. http://www.nationalaudiovideo.com.
PII: S0011-3840(07)00031-7
doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2007.03.002
© 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Current Problems in Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 5
, Pages 281-337
, May 2007
